Quality of Life and Psychological Distress Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis at Rizgary Teaching Hospital in Erbil City

Authors

  • Darbaz Karim Taha Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Abdulqader Hussein Hamad Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/ejnm.2025.19

Keywords:

Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of life, Psychological Distress, Axiety, Depression

Abstract

Background and objectives: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition that impacts both physical health and psychological well-being. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of life and psychological distress in multiple sclerosis patients at Rizgary Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, Iraq.

Methods: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Rizgary Teaching Hospital-Multiple Sclerosis Center in Erbil City. 159 patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis were recruited in the study to assess the quality of life and the prevalence of psychological distress among multiple sclerosis patients. Data collection was conducted by face-to-face interviews, data analysis was performed using SPSS version 28, and data collection occurred from November 15, 2024, until February 15, 2025.

Results: The study revealed that patients with multiple sclerosis demonstrated a moderate to favourable quality of life, with physical health recording the lowest mean score (59.03 ± 14.28). Anxiety was observed in 34%, while depression was in 22%. Gender, employment, and education were significant factors correlated with anxiety and depression. Psychological distress exhibited an inverse correlation with quality of life.

Conclusion: The findings of this study reported moderate to favourable quality of life, with physical health most affected. A significant proportion of patients reported high levels of psychological distress, including symptoms of anxiety and depression, which negatively impacted their overall well-being. Sociodemographic variables such as gender, education level, and duration of illness were found to have an influence on both quality of life and psychological distress levels.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, Cutter GR, Sørensen PS, Thompson AJ, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology. 2014;83(3):278–286.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/ WNL.0000000000000560

Mitchell AJ, Benito-León J, González JM, Rivera- Navarro J. Quality of life and its assessment in multiple sclerosis: integrating physical and psychological components of wellbeing. The Lancet Neurology. 2005;4(9):556– 566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70166-6

Marrie RA, Horwitz R, Cutter G, Tyry T, Campagnolo D, Vollmer T. The burden of mental comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: frequent, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Multiple Sclerosis Journal.2009;15(3): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458508099477.

Bamer AM, Johnson KL, Amtmann D, Kraft GH. Prevalence of sleep problems in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2008;14(8):1127–1130.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458508092807

Putzki N, Karg MJ, Harati A, Faiss JH, Schimrigk S, Reiners K, et al. Health-related quality of life and its relationship to anxiety and depression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2001;187(1–2):87–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00564-X

Amato MP, Zipoli V, Portaccio E. Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2006;245(1–2):41– DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2005.08.019

Araoye MO. Research methodology with statistics for health and social sciences. Ilorin Nathadex Publishers;2003. doi: Not available (book)

Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. Quality of Life Research. 2004;13(2):299–310.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/ B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00

Huang Y. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a meta-analytic review of psychometric properties. Journal of Psychosomatic Research.2019;126:109. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica.

;67 (6):361370.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2002;52(2):69–77. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3.

Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003;1:29.DOI:https:// doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-29

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp.;2021. doi: Not available (software manual)

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

1.
Karim Taha D, Hussein Hamad A. Quality of Life and Psychological Distress Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis at Rizgary Teaching Hospital in Erbil City. Erbil j. nurs. midwifery [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 30 [cited 2026 Feb. 4];8(2):187-9. Available from: https://ejnm.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/ejnm/article/view/343

Issue

Section

Original Articles